Champion profile

Anivia in draft

Played at Mid in 82% of its games. A role under 30 games still opens, with counts only.

Presence (pick + ban)

11 %

picked or banned · 76th of 173 championshalf of the champions are under 8.8%

Picked 4% · 1,011 of 26,227 gamesBanned 7% · 1,489 of 21,707 drafts with bans

Win rate at Mid

28,125 games from amateur tournaments, last 60 days, KR 67% · EUW 23% · NA 10%

Population: amateur tournaments created with tournament codes — neither solo queue nor the pro scene.

Everything below reads on 830 games at Mid. · 992 drafts without entered bans excluded from the ban denominator (21,707 games with bans) · Index built on Oct 26, 2026, 1:34 AM

In short

Four answers. Each card opens its chapter.

01 · In draftOpening ban: removed in phase 1.Banned, it makes room for

Taliyah

02 · In a compWhat sets it apart from other mid lanersLets allies carryCCFew duelsNo pokeNo split-push

03 · With / againstGood against Sivir, bad against Vi.Good against

Sivir71%34 gamesBad against

Vi33%54 gamesBad duo with

Karma33%42 games

04 · BuildOne path: Rod of Ages.

Electrocute

Ban it or pick it?

Its place in the scene's drafts, and what happens when it is not there.

Where it is played

Share of Mid picks taken by Anivia, and its ban share, in each source

SoloQ

Master+ · ranked games of tracked players

1.3%19,331 picks out of 1,512,265banned in 3.1% of games · 6,945 of 223,526patches 16.21 → 16.19

Tournaments

tournament code games

1.6%503 picks out of 30,800banned in 6.9% of games · 832 of 12,018patches 16.21 → 16.19

Pro

all leagues · lolesports

3.7%80 picks out of 2,182lolesports does not provide banspatches 16.20 → 16.17

Frequency only: share of the role's picks in each source, over ITS last 3 patches with games — the page's period does not apply · under 30 games in the role, not measured · the three sources are never added up · ban share over games whose bans are read only (soloQ: games collected since 10/17)

Presence by patch

Between 10% and 18% since 16.8 · 14.6% on 16.21 · 10.5% on 16.20

show the detail of the 11 patches

Patch	Presence	Games	Majority keystone
16.21	14.6%	970	Electrocute61% · 23
16.20	10.5%	7,756	Electrocute68% · 175
16.19	10.6%	6,674	Electrocute65% · 135
16.18	11.2%	5,755	Electrocute62% · 104
16.17	9.7%	5,712	Electrocute59% · 100
16.16	11.7%	5,979	Electrocute68% · 132
16.15	10.7%	5,519	Electrocute65% · 104
16.14	11.2%	5,697	Electrocute62% · 103
16.13	13.0%	7,360	Electrocute59% · 163
16.12	15.7%	5,098	Electrocute60% · 137
16.8	18.3%	205	Electrocute90% · 9

Presence = picks + bans over the patch's games, all regions · the axis follows the calendar: a patch without games leaves a void · hollow point under 30 games, nothing compared

When it gets banned

Opening ban: removed in phase 1.

1,489 bans of 21,707 drafts with bans · the phase in strong ink grounds the reading line

Fearless

Fearless: fallback pick — brought out late in the series, once the pool is drained.

G13.4%
G23.4%
G3+5.3%

Once burnt, the series moves to

Ahri21

Galio15

Hwei14

series, of 217 where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role

Share of each series game where it is picked · replacements: series where it is played in G1 then replaced at the same role (217), published from 30 series

If it is banned, they pick

What is played more often at Mid when Anivia is banned than when it is free, on both sides.

Read at Mid, its main role: a ban has no role, it takes this one away first.

Taliyah
3.7% → 6.1%

1,489 games where it is banned · 19,405 where it is free and not picked · share of the role's picks: ○ free → ● banned · what the ban brings out, never why

When it is picked, the scene protects itself from

Comps with Anivia ban these champions in phase 2 more often than other comps.

Viktor×1.52

× = phase 2 bans in its comps relative to other comps, kept from ×1.25 · 44,638 tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12, the draft review window

What does it bring to a comp?

What its kit brings to its team, phase by phase, then in fights.

Read on tournament games from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12 (44,638 games) · same reading as the draft review · compared with other mid laners

Phase by phase

Lane · 5–14 minMid game · 15–22Late · 23–30

Damage / mintick = the mid laners

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Gold vs. direct opponent

Lane · 5–14 min

Mid game · 15–22

Late · 23–30

Not measured after 20 min: gold then follows the game's result.

Map pressuretakedowns outside its lane

Lane · 5–14 min2.9 takedowns outside its lane before 15 min · mid laners: 3.2

After 15 min

Measured before 15 min only.

Damage to champions per minute, at equal gold · gold against the direct opponent on a fixed ± 1,000 scale · map pressure before 15 min

In fights

itmid laners
Damage absorbed per minute.
Share of its takedowns taken with several allies.
Share of its takedowns taken in a duel.
Damage from its four allies per kill when it takes part: a high rank means it lets its allies carry the damage, a low rank that it carries it itself.
Riot CC score per minute.
Share of its team's damage.

Bar centred on mid laners: to the right, more than them; to the left, less · fixed order, never sorted by value

What it is, what it is not

What marks itLets allies carryCC

What it is notFew duelsNo pokeNo split-push

Labels set by the server: the fact's criterion when it has one, otherwise the role rank (from 75 or at 25 and below)

Its tempo

level 6 at 5:12 (5:12), 1st item at 11:36 (12:00), 2nd at 20:00 (20:30), 3rd at 26:48 (26:36).

830 games · median minute of each milestone, mid laners in brackets

With whom, against whom?

The win rate is a range: only a range entirely on one side of 50% says something.

Allies and opponents

Its opponents, most frequent first.

Facing	Games	Reading
YunaraADC	88	Leans against itbetween 38% and 55%
LuluSUP	82	Evenbetween 43% and 61%
NautilusSUP	76	Evenbetween 40% and 58%
Lee SinJGL	70	Leans against itbetween 34% and 53%
WukongJGL	67	Leans against itbetween 35% and 55%
RyzeMID	67	Leans against itbetween 37% and 56%
CaitlynADC	65	Leans against itbetween 36% and 56%
LeonaSUP	62	Leans its waybetween 46% and 66%
Jarvan IVJGL	60	Leans its waybetween 43% and 64%
ViktorMID	59	Favourablebetween 52% and 72%

show 161 other pairs

AhriMID	58	Leans against itbetween 36% and 57%
MilioSUP	56	Evenbetween 41% and 62%
ViJGL	54	Unfavourablebetween 24% and 45%
Kai'SaADC	54	Leans its waybetween 43% and 64%
ThreshSUP	54	Evenbetween 39% and 61%
OrnnTOP	53	Leans against itbetween 29% and 51%
SyndraMID	52	Evenbetween 37% and 59%
JhinADC	52	Evenbetween 37% and 59%
BraumSUP	51	Evenbetween 42% and 64%
JinxADC	50	Unfavourablebetween 28% and 50%
XayahADC	49	Leans its waybetween 42% and 64%
EzrealADC	47	Leans its waybetween 43% and 67%
K'SanteTOP	45	Leans its waybetween 46% and 69%
SylasJGL	45	Leans its waybetween 41% and 65%
SeraphineSUP	44	Unfavourablebetween 26% and 49%
Xin ZhaoJGL	43	Leans against itbetween 30% and 54%
AsheADC	43	Evenbetween 39% and 63%
AmbessaTOP	42	Evenbetween 40% and 65%
LucianADC	42	Evenbetween 40% and 65%
ZeriADC	40	Leans against itbetween 33% and 58%
SionTOP	39	Favourablebetween 51% and 75%
XerathMID	39	Evenbetween 39% and 64%
TristanaADC	38	Evenbetween 35% and 60%
CassiopeiaMID	37	Leans against itbetween 26% and 51%
MalphiteTOP	36	Evenbetween 34% and 61%
SivirADC	34	Favourablebetween 57% and 82%
RakanSUP	34	Evenbetween 39% and 66%
RellSUP	34	Leans its waybetween 42% and 69%
ApheliosADC	33	Leans against itbetween 27% and 54%
RenektonTOP	32	Leans its waybetween 42% and 70%
Dr. MundoTOP	31	Leans its waybetween 40% and 69%
GnarTOP	31	Leans against itbetween 23% and 50%
ZaahenTOP	31	Evenbetween 37% and 66%
YoneMID	31	Leans its waybetween 40% and 69%
OlafTOP	30	Unfavourablebetween 18% and 45%
KarmaSUP	30	Leans its waybetween 39% and 67%
AuroraMID	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
OriannaMID	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
BlitzcrankSUP	29	Too few for a rate (29 of 30)
AlistarSUP	28	Too few for a rate (28 of 30)
YuumiSUP	27	Too few for a rate (27 of 30)
MordekaiserTOP	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
QiyanaJGL	26	Too few for a rate (26 of 30)
AatroxTOP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
NasusTOP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
HweiMID	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
NeekoSUP	25	Too few for a rate (25 of 30)
YoneTOP	24	Too few for a rate (24 of 30)
JaxTOP	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
LeBlancMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
LissandraMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
LockeMID	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
Miss FortuneADC	23	Too few for a rate (23 of 30)
GwenTOP	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
NocturneJGL	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
ViegoJGL	22	Too few for a rate (22 of 30)
CamilleTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
ShenTOP	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
PantheonJGL	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
SejuaniJGL	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
TrundleJGL	21	Too few for a rate (21 of 30)
SylasMID	20	Too few for a rate (20 of 30)
GalioMID	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
PoppySUP	18	Too few for a rate (18 of 30)
LilliaJGL	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
TaliyahMID	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
KalistaADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
VarusADC	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
BardSUP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
PykeSUP	17	Too few for a rate (17 of 30)
SkarnerJGL	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
AkaliMID	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
AzirMID	16	Too few for a rate (16 of 30)
RumbleTOP	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
MelMID	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
Twisted FateMID	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
VeigarMID	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
ViktorADC	15	Too few for a rate (15 of 30)
LuxSUP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
MorganaSUP	14	Too few for a rate (14 of 30)
SettTOP	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
CorkiADC	13	Too few for a rate (13 of 30)
FioraTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
JayceTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
YorickTOP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
JayceJGL	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
Kha'ZixJGL	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
AnnieMID	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
ZedMID	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
ZiggsADC	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
Renata GlascSUP	12	Too few for a rate (12 of 30)
GarenTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GragasTOP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
GravesJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
ShyvanaJGL	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
SmolderADC	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
SorakaSUP	11	Too few for a rate (11 of 30)
EliseJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
KaynJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
MaokaiJGL	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
TristanaMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
VladimirMID	10	Too few for a rate (10 of 30)
IreliaTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
PoppyTOP	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
AmumuJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
ZyraJGL	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
VexMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
YasuoMID	9	Too few for a rate (9 of 30)
Cho'GathTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
DariusTOP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
EkkoJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
NaafiriJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
PoppyJGL	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
LuxMID	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
SeraphineADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
VayneADC	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
NamiSUP	8	Too few for a rate (8 of 30)
DariusTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
VladimirTOP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
KindredJGL	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
EkkoMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
MalzaharMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
SionMID	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
MaokaiSUP	7	Too few for a rate (7 of 30)
AkaliTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
KennenTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
SingedTOP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
AatroxJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
Dr. MundoJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
NidaleeJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ZaahenJGL	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
GalioMID	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
DravenADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
Kog'MawADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
VeigarADC	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
MelSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ShenSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
ZileanSUP	6	Too few for a rate (6 of 30)
IllaoiTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
JayceTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
MaokaiTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Tahm KenchTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TrundleTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
UrgotTOP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Cho'GathJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
DianaJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
HecarimJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ShyvanaJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZacJGL	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
AmbessaMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
Aurelion SolMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
FizzMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
IreliaMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SwainMID	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SamiraADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
TwitchADC	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
PantheonSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
SylasSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)
ZyraSUP	5	Too few for a rate (5 of 30)

Sorted by number of games · 171 pairs in this view.

Allies and opponents over 830 games, listed from 5 games per pair; under 30 games, only W/L counts are written.

How is it built?

Keystone, spells, first skill maxed and item paths, on the fallback level that has enough games.

The usual build

Read on patch 16.21, all regions.

Patch16.21 · 38 games
2 patches296 games
Window830 games

Keystone + secondary tree

Electrocute+

Precision

61% · 23 games

Summoner spells

Flash + Teleport

95% · 36 games

First maxed skill

100% · 38 games

show 4 other choices of runes, spells or skill maxed

Other runes

orDeathfire Touch+Precision29% · 11 games
orElectrocute+Sorcery13% · 5 games

Other spells

orFlash + Ghost3% · 1 game
orFlash + Ignite3% · 1 game

38 games at the level read · a level is read from 30 games

Item paths

One item path, from the most played 1st item to the least.

Rod of Ages95% · 11:54
Malignance47% · 19:42

Each % reads along the path: at the 1st item, over the games that completed a 1st item; then, over those that made the previous steps AND completed one more item. A path stops under 10 games · median minute the item is completed, from 3 games.

show how we count

Draft, with / against and build: the filters at the top of the page (window, regions, level). What follows the meta moves fast.
In a comp and “the scene protects itself from”: 180 days of tournaments (from 2026-04-15 to 2026-10-12), the draft review window. A champion's kit changes little, it needs volume.
All games come from Master+ amateur tournaments. No soloQ.
A win rate is written from 30 games, always with its range. Under that threshold, wins and losses are written.
What the data does not say: the pick order (missing from the Riot API), engage (no reliable measure).